Yeah, but you've lost more suits than a Men's Wearhouse in a tornado.

可你输过的官司[丢掉的西装]比遭遇龙卷风的西装大卖场还多。

Jos. A. Bank started the needle match in October, offering $2.3 billion for its bigger rival, Men's Wearhouse.

Jos.A.Bank在十月首先发难，要约23亿美元收购更强大的对手Men's Warehouse。

One argument used by Men's Wearhouse in rejecting its rival's bid was that a merger would " raise significant antitrust concerns" .

Men's Warehouse的一个反对Jos.A. Bank收购的理由是兼并会“引起反托拉斯的忧虑。”

When that failed to measure up, Men's Wearhouse offered to buy Jos.A. Bank, first for $1.5 billion, then for $1.6 billion. Which can tailor a deal?

结果失败了，紧跟着，Men's Warehouse开始以15亿美元，后来提高到16亿美元收购Jos.A.Bank。

Both firms argued that a merger would yield huge synergies. But as the two firms have different customers, Men's Wearhouse targeting younger, more fashionable men, Jos. A. Bank the more conservative, older chap, there would be few store closures.

两家公司都说收购会产生巨大的协同效应。可是两家公司有不同的客户——Men's Warehouse定位于更年轻更时尚的男子，Jos.A. Bank的客户更保守更年长一些，所以，不会有店铺关门。