Also, a potential explanation for these associations is reverse causality.

此外，对这些关联的潜在解释恰恰是反向的因果关系。

We are looking for causality, reason.

我们在寻找因果关系，原因。

Causality, Cognitive Maps, the Convergent Evolution Theory of Intelligence.

的计划 智力的趋同进化理论。

Corporal Bordman , Private Splanders and Johnson , among the long list of other causalities.

Bordman下士，二等兵Splanders and Johnson，在众多其他因果关系中。

All things happen in accordance with the laws of causality.

所有的事情都按照因果关系的规律发生。

In this paradigm, as he explains, there were clear causalities, certainties.

正如他所解释的那样，在这种范式中，有明确的因果关系和确定性。

Are they pointing out causality, which is what it seems like they're implying.

他们是否指出了因果关系，这似乎是他们在暗示的。

It's almost as if they didn't understand the causality of needing to remove the lid.

就好像他们不明白需要取下盖子的因果关系一样。

The only previous study analyzing causality, based on an area in Mexico that had instituted CCTs, supported the traditional view.

之前唯一一项分析因果关系的研究是基于墨西哥的一个地区，该地区已经建立了 CCTs，支持传统观点。

But maybe the causality goes the other way around.

但也可能是因果关系颠倒了。

These sorts of association studies cannot prove causality.

这类关联研究无法证明因果关系。

Instead, every bit of behavior has multiple levels of causality.

相反， 每一点行为都有多层次的因果关系。

So it looks like they are kind of implying causality.

所以看起来它们有点暗示因果关系。

I'm a little obsessed with this distinction between recording responses and establishing causality.

我有点着迷于记录反应和建立因果关系之间的区别。

In the question of causality then, we are tempted to say that Aristotle was wrong.

那么在因果关系问题上， 我们很想说亚里士多德错了。

They can't prove causality, doesn't meet the standard, this whole thing stops here.

他们无法证明因果关系，不符合标准，整个事情到此为止。

The book only told him it was causality in the physics category.

书本只告诉他这是物理范畴的因果关系。

In economics, it is easier to agree on the data than to agree on causality.

在经济学中，就数据达成一致比就因果关系达成一致更容易。

We should say: it can be hard to pin down the causality on the benefits of marriage.

我们应该说：很难确定婚姻的好处之间的因果关系。

A better study would be one that is able to prove causality.

一项更好的研究将是能够证明因果关系的研究。